tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8951904624959546499.post856561369889607339..comments2009-02-05T08:10:01.827-05:00Eric Jacobsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08216361684596485033noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8951904624959546499.post-90141941162507244072009-02-04T20:42:00.000-05:002009-02-04T20:42:00.000-05:00I'm assuming the feature had been in that state for some time. That means their probably should have been a test for it. That test should have failed a long time ago. And if, during evaluation of that failed test, you realized you liked the feature the way it was, the feature description and the test should have changed.<BR/><BR/>Gosh there are a lot of shoulds in there.<BR/><BR/>I guess I'm saying that what went wrong was that there was no test for that feature.Alexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07298916960841993037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8951904624959546499.post-41731580993008671222009-02-04T19:35:00.000-05:002009-02-04T19:35:00.000-05:00- No bug report<BR/>- corrected it on their own<BR/><BR/>That's what went wrong.Joehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16849072656100416768noreply@blogger.com